<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 754 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194338</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the application for rectification of mistake, stating it exceeded its jurisdiction. The Tribunal highlighted that the Adjudicating Authority should assess all factors, including the assessee&#039;s intention and case circumstances, before imposing a penalty. Mere tax demand confirmation does not mandate penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 754 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194338</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the application for rectification of mistake, stating it exceeded its jurisdiction. The Tribunal highlighted that the Adjudicating Authority should assess all factors, including the assessee&#039;s intention and case circumstances, before imposing a penalty. Mere tax demand confirmation does not mandate penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>