<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 866 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194329</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment in a contempt proceeding, where the respondents were found to have not complied with a previous court order effectively. The Supreme Court emphasized the purpose of contempt jurisdiction in upholding court dignity and stated that contempt power should focus on deliberate disobedience of court orders. It was held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting substantive reliefs not covered in the original judgment, leading to the dismissal of the contempt petition and allowing the writ petitioners to address their grievances through the appropriate forum.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:28:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 866 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194329</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment in a contempt proceeding, where the respondents were found to have not complied with a previous court order effectively. The Supreme Court emphasized the purpose of contempt jurisdiction in upholding court dignity and stated that contempt power should focus on deliberate disobedience of court orders. It was held that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by granting substantive reliefs not covered in the original judgment, leading to the dismissal of the contempt petition and allowing the writ petitioners to address their grievances through the appropriate forum.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>