https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194323 A State defendant is bound by a valid temporary injunction and may be proceeded against under Order 39 Rule 2(3) for wilful disobedience. Construing the injunction with the plaint and injunction application, the Court treated the restraint on "notification" as covering a notification under Section 3(1) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, so its publication amounted to breach. The notification remained attributable to the State because it was issued in the Governor's name through the constitutional executive process, and participation by subordinate officers did not sever State responsibility. Attachment for breach was therefore upheld. en-us Tue, 20 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 12:22:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194323 A State defendant is bound by a valid temporary injunction and may be proceeded against under Order 39 Rule 2(3) for wilful disobedience. Construing the injunction with the plaint and injunction application, the Court treated the restraint on "notification" as covering a notification under Section 3(1) of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950, so its publication amounted to breach. The notification remained attributable to the State because it was issued in the Governor's name through the constitutional executive process, and participation by subordinate officers did not sever State responsibility. Attachment for breach was therefore upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Sep 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194323