<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1701 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194322</link>
    <description>A lease agreement clause requiring any dispute arising out of, in relation to, or in connection with the lease to be finally resolved by a single arbitrator was applied to the parties&#039; dispute. In view of the agreed position and the contractual arbitration clause, the matter was required to be referred to arbitration under the arbitration statute. The suit and the interim application were disposed of accordingly after reference to arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 12:12:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1701 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194322</link>
      <description>A lease agreement clause requiring any dispute arising out of, in relation to, or in connection with the lease to be finally resolved by a single arbitrator was applied to the parties&#039; dispute. In view of the agreed position and the contractual arbitration clause, the matter was required to be referred to arbitration under the arbitration statute. The suit and the interim application were disposed of accordingly after reference to arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>