https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347476 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on the additional commission received by the appellant, considering it as income for providing Business Auxiliary Services to the company. The appellant's argument that the amount was a discount, not payment for services, was rejected. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities were crucial for the company's marketing strategy, qualifying as services falling under Business Auxiliary Services. The appeal was dismissed on 4th August 2017, affirming the tax liability. en-us Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jan 2018 15:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347476 The Tribunal upheld the service tax demand on the additional commission received by the appellant, considering it as income for providing Business Auxiliary Services to the company. The appellant's argument that the amount was a discount, not payment for services, was rejected. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities were crucial for the company's marketing strategy, qualifying as services falling under Business Auxiliary Services. The appeal was dismissed on 4th August 2017, affirming the tax liability. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347476