<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 232 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the demand for Service Tax to the normal period without imposing penalties. The judgment was pronounced on 03.08.2017 by the Tribunal comprising Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial), and Mr. B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 08:42:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 232 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the demand for Service Tax to the normal period without imposing penalties. The judgment was pronounced on 03.08.2017 by the Tribunal comprising Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Member (Judicial), and Mr. B. Ravichandran, Member (Technical).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>