https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347474 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax on the cleaning of coaches/toilets and the supply of bed rolls to passengers under the category of business support services. The tribunal found that the services provided were more appropriately classified under business auxiliary services as "Customer care services provided on behalf of the client," rather than falling under business support services as argued by the Department. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside. en-us Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347474 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for service tax on the cleaning of coaches/toilets and the supply of bed rolls to passengers under the category of business support services. The tribunal found that the services provided were more appropriately classified under business auxiliary services as "Customer care services provided on behalf of the client," rather than falling under business support services as argued by the Department. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the impugned orders were set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347474