<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 230 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s catering services fell under the taxable category of &quot;Outdoor Catering Service,&quot; upholding the service tax liability but waiving penalties under Section 76 and 78. Despite the non-appearance of the respondent, the Tribunal relied on records and Revenue submissions to make its decision. The appeals of the Revenue were disposed of in favor of upholding the tax liability without imposing penalties on the respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 08:37:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 230 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the respondent&#039;s catering services fell under the taxable category of &quot;Outdoor Catering Service,&quot; upholding the service tax liability but waiving penalties under Section 76 and 78. Despite the non-appearance of the respondent, the Tribunal relied on records and Revenue submissions to make its decision. The appeals of the Revenue were disposed of in favor of upholding the tax liability without imposing penalties on the respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>