https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347459 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding errors in the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties. The tribunal held that the penalty should be reduced by 25% due to the significant decrease in the demand of duty. Additionally, the matter was remanded to the lower adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The tribunal allowed some appeals and modified the original order, addressing the issues raised in the case effectively. en-us Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347459 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, finding errors in the confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties. The tribunal held that the penalty should be reduced by 25% due to the significant decrease in the demand of duty. Additionally, the matter was remanded to the lower adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The tribunal allowed some appeals and modified the original order, addressing the issues raised in the case effectively. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347459