https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347458 The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty against the appellant for exceeding the SSI exemption limit. The appellant's request for excess payment appropriation was partially granted, with the option to seek further redressal. The penalty under Section 11AC was upheld due to non-disclosure of goods removal without duty payment. The penalty on the power of attorney holder was reduced, considering his involvement in the non-payment of excise duty. The appeal of the appellant was dismissed, while the power of attorney holder's appeal was partly allowed. en-us Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Sep 2017 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347458 The Tribunal upheld the demand of duty against the appellant for exceeding the SSI exemption limit. The appellant's request for excess payment appropriation was partially granted, with the option to seek further redressal. The penalty under Section 11AC was upheld due to non-disclosure of goods removal without duty payment. The penalty on the power of attorney holder was reduced, considering his involvement in the non-payment of excise duty. The appeal of the appellant was dismissed, while the power of attorney holder's appeal was partly allowed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347458