<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 207 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347450</link>
    <description>Transportation, laying, joining and testing charges for cement pipes were held not deductible from assessable value because the contract required the manufacturer to transport the goods to the site and complete unloading, shifting, lowering, laying and joining before delivery. On that factual basis, property in the goods was found to pass only at the buyer&#039;s premises, not at the factory gate. Applying Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, with the valuation principles and Section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, expenses incurred before transfer of ownership remained part of assessable value. The deductions were disallowed, the revenue&#039;s valuation was upheld, and the adjudication order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 207 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347450</link>
      <description>Transportation, laying, joining and testing charges for cement pipes were held not deductible from assessable value because the contract required the manufacturer to transport the goods to the site and complete unloading, shifting, lowering, laying and joining before delivery. On that factual basis, property in the goods was found to pass only at the buyer&#039;s premises, not at the factory gate. Applying Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, with the valuation principles and Section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, expenses incurred before transfer of ownership remained part of assessable value. The deductions were disallowed, the revenue&#039;s valuation was upheld, and the adjudication order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>