https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347442 The High Court held that the Value Added Tax Officer's review of assessment orders previously set aside by the Appellate Tribunal was impermissible. The Court found the review after 8 years without notice to the Petitioner unwarranted and emphasized the lack of authority for such actions. Consequently, the Court set aside all 24 impugned orders passed by the VATO, including those related to tax assessment and penalties under the DVAT Act. The Department was allowed to challenge the AT's order through legal remedies. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the Petitioner with no costs awarded. en-us Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Sep 2017 08:19:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347442 The High Court held that the Value Added Tax Officer's review of assessment orders previously set aside by the Appellate Tribunal was impermissible. The Court found the review after 8 years without notice to the Petitioner unwarranted and emphasized the lack of authority for such actions. Consequently, the Court set aside all 24 impugned orders passed by the VATO, including those related to tax assessment and penalties under the DVAT Act. The Department was allowed to challenge the AT's order through legal remedies. The writ petition was allowed in favor of the Petitioner with no costs awarded. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 30 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347442