<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 195 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347438</link>
    <description>The petition seeking an investigation under Section 213(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 into alleged mismanagement of a company was dismissed by the tribunal due to lack of substantial evidence supporting fraud or misconduct claims. The challenge to the legality of certain Board meetings was also rejected, with the tribunal finding no grounds to declare them illegal. Additionally, the request for a refund of US$ 2 million equity with interest was denied, as insufficient evidence was presented to support the claim. The petition was ultimately dismissed, with costs awarded against the petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488105" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 195 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347438</link>
      <description>The petition seeking an investigation under Section 213(b) of the Companies Act, 2013 into alleged mismanagement of a company was dismissed by the tribunal due to lack of substantial evidence supporting fraud or misconduct claims. The challenge to the legality of certain Board meetings was also rejected, with the tribunal finding no grounds to declare them illegal. Additionally, the request for a refund of US$ 2 million equity with interest was denied, as insufficient evidence was presented to support the claim. The petition was ultimately dismissed, with costs awarded against the petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>