<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 95 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9788</link>
    <description>Interest under section 7C of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 was leviable where the assessee filed a nil estimate and paid no advance surtax, because section 7A required advance payment on the basis of the assessee&#039;s own estimate and section 7C applied whenever advance surtax fell below eighty-three and one-third per cent of the assessed surtax. The court held that complete non-payment did not take the case outside the statutory interest provision, as the scheme was designed to ensure compliance with the prescribed advance-tax threshold. The levy was therefore upheld and the issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48810" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 95 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9788</link>
      <description>Interest under section 7C of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 was leviable where the assessee filed a nil estimate and paid no advance surtax, because section 7A required advance payment on the basis of the assessee&#039;s own estimate and section 7C applied whenever advance surtax fell below eighty-three and one-third per cent of the assessed surtax. The court held that complete non-payment did not take the case outside the statutory interest provision, as the scheme was designed to ensure compliance with the prescribed advance-tax threshold. The levy was therefore upheld and the issue was answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>