<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1247 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194315</link>
    <description>Preventive detention under COFEPOSA requires the detaining authority to consider all material circumstances, including retraction of inculpatory statements and relied upon documents, and to show a proximate factual nexus justifying detention. The detention was found vitiated because the grounds did not reflect awareness of the detenus&#039; retractions, the delay between the incident and the order was not satisfactorily explained, the declaration card was not properly placed or supplied, and there was no adequate material showing a real likelihood of future smuggling. On these grounds, the detention could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 22:07:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1247 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194315</link>
      <description>Preventive detention under COFEPOSA requires the detaining authority to consider all material circumstances, including retraction of inculpatory statements and relied upon documents, and to show a proximate factual nexus justifying detention. The detention was found vitiated because the grounds did not reflect awareness of the detenus&#039; retractions, the delay between the incident and the order was not satisfactorily explained, the declaration card was not properly placed or supplied, and there was no adequate material showing a real likelihood of future smuggling. On these grounds, the detention could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>