<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 176 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to adopt the sale consideration and cost of acquisition as declared by the assessee. The additional ground challenging the jurisdiction of the DVO was upheld, rendering the DVO&#039;s report invalid. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal provisions and proper jurisdiction in valuation matters, nullifying the addition of capital gain and affirming the assessee&#039;s declared values.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488044" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 176 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to adopt the sale consideration and cost of acquisition as declared by the assessee. The additional ground challenging the jurisdiction of the DVO was upheld, rendering the DVO&#039;s report invalid. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to legal provisions and proper jurisdiction in valuation matters, nullifying the addition of capital gain and affirming the assessee&#039;s declared values.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>