https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194293 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of harvesting and transportation of sugar cane services. The Tribunal held that the services should be classified under Business Auxiliary Service, not Manpower Supply Service, based on established precedents. Consequently, the demands for service tax were deemed unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed with necessary relief. en-us Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Sep 2017 16:33:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194293 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants in a case concerning the classification of harvesting and transportation of sugar cane services. The Tribunal held that the services should be classified under Business Auxiliary Service, not Manpower Supply Service, based on established precedents. Consequently, the demands for service tax were deemed unsustainable, and the appeals were allowed with necessary relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 03 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194293