<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1637 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194289</link>
    <description>Section 36(1) confers a broad and independent power on TRAI to make regulations for carrying out the purposes of the Act, subject only to consistency with the Act and the rules made under Section 35; the matters in Section 36(2) are illustrative and do not limit that power. The scheme of Sections 11, 12 and 13 does not narrow the regulation-making authority. However, regulations made under Section 36 are subordinate legislation, and the words &quot;direction&quot;, &quot;decision&quot; and &quot;order&quot; in Section 14(b) do not cover a challenge to their validity. TDSAT therefore had no jurisdiction to entertain such a challenge, which lies before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2023 17:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1637 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194289</link>
      <description>Section 36(1) confers a broad and independent power on TRAI to make regulations for carrying out the purposes of the Act, subject only to consistency with the Act and the rules made under Section 35; the matters in Section 36(2) are illustrative and do not limit that power. The scheme of Sections 11, 12 and 13 does not narrow the regulation-making authority. However, regulations made under Section 36 are subordinate legislation, and the words &quot;direction&quot;, &quot;decision&quot; and &quot;order&quot; in Section 14(b) do not cover a challenge to their validity. TDSAT therefore had no jurisdiction to entertain such a challenge, which lies before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>