<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 88 - HIMACHAL PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9781</link>
    <description>The appeal was accepted, setting aside the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s decision. The writ petition by the assessee was dismissed, emphasizing the need for notices under section 148 for earlier years to adhere to limitation provisions. Additionally, the court directed an inquiry into the conduct of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Shimla, by the Chief Vigilance Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 88 - HIMACHAL PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9781</link>
      <description>The appeal was accepted, setting aside the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order and restoring the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s decision. The writ petition by the assessee was dismissed, emphasizing the need for notices under section 148 for earlier years to adhere to limitation provisions. Additionally, the court directed an inquiry into the conduct of the Commissioner of Income-tax, Shimla, by the Chief Vigilance Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>