https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194287 Domestic law controlled enforcement of foreign warrants and INTERPOL notices in India, and a Red Corner Notice could not by itself authorise arrest, detention or surrender without compliance with the Extradition Act, 1962 and the applicable treaty. Foreign custody and restrain orders were not directly enforceable unless they satisfied the statutory tests for recognition and enforcement under Sections 13 and 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The CBI, as National Central Bureau for INTERPOL, could coordinate notices and transmit information, but had no independent coercive power. The appeal was allowed and relief granted. en-us Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Sep 2023 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194287 Domestic law controlled enforcement of foreign warrants and INTERPOL notices in India, and a Red Corner Notice could not by itself authorise arrest, detention or surrender without compliance with the Extradition Act, 1962 and the applicable treaty. Foreign custody and restrain orders were not directly enforceable unless they satisfied the statutory tests for recognition and enforcement under Sections 13 and 44A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The CBI, as National Central Bureau for INTERPOL, could coordinate notices and transmit information, but had no independent coercive power. The appeal was allowed and relief granted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194287