<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1209 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194286</link>
    <description>A regulation framed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission under Section 178 is subordinate legislation and not an appealable order under Section 111, so the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity lacked jurisdiction to test its validity. Section 121 confers only supervisory power to issue directions for statutory performance and does not create a judicial review power over delegated legislation, so it could not be used to invalidate the regulations. The Commission was competent to cap trading margin by regulation under Section 178, as the Act permits general regulatory prescriptions beyond individual orders under Section 79(1)(j). The challenge therefore had to be pursued through constitutional judicial review, not before the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2024 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1209 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194286</link>
      <description>A regulation framed by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission under Section 178 is subordinate legislation and not an appealable order under Section 111, so the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity lacked jurisdiction to test its validity. Section 121 confers only supervisory power to issue directions for statutory performance and does not create a judicial review power over delegated legislation, so it could not be used to invalidate the regulations. The Commission was competent to cap trading margin by regulation under Section 178, as the Act permits general regulatory prescriptions beyond individual orders under Section 79(1)(j). The challenge therefore had to be pursued through constitutional judicial review, not before the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>