<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1096 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194285</link>
    <description>For rape of a girl below twelve years, the statutory minimum sentence of ten years rigorous imprisonment could be departed from only for adequate and special reasons recorded in the judgment. The High Court&#039;s reliance on the accused&#039;s age, family circumstances, illiteracy, alleged intoxication, and social background was insufficient to justify reduction below that minimum. The trial court&#039;s sentence was supported by the victim&#039;s age, the cruel nature of the offence, and the absence of mitigating factors. The reduction to four years was therefore set aside and the original ten-year sentence restored, while the conviction, fine, and default sentence were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 11:24:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1096 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194285</link>
      <description>For rape of a girl below twelve years, the statutory minimum sentence of ten years rigorous imprisonment could be departed from only for adequate and special reasons recorded in the judgment. The High Court&#039;s reliance on the accused&#039;s age, family circumstances, illiteracy, alleged intoxication, and social background was insufficient to justify reduction below that minimum. The trial court&#039;s sentence was supported by the victim&#039;s age, the cruel nature of the offence, and the absence of mitigating factors. The reduction to four years was therefore set aside and the original ten-year sentence restored, while the conviction, fine, and default sentence were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>