<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 162 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the demand on actuals (electricity, water, insurance), remanded the issue of CENVAT credit eligibility, and directed the adjudicating authority to quantify the service tax liability on MMR services. The appeal filed by the department was allowed by way of remand for denovo adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=488006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 162 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the demand on actuals (electricity, water, insurance), remanded the issue of CENVAT credit eligibility, and directed the adjudicating authority to quantify the service tax liability on MMR services. The appeal filed by the department was allowed by way of remand for denovo adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>