https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347399 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority to examine the issue of double taxation and cum-duty benefit. The appellant's argument of working under a bona fide belief and against double taxation was acknowledged. The Tribunal emphasized that if the principal had already paid the Service Tax, it cannot be demanded again from the appellant, highlighting the importance of Board's Circulars. The remand aimed to ensure a thorough review of the matter and address concerns regarding double taxation and tax already paid by the principal. en-us Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347399 The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority to examine the issue of double taxation and cum-duty benefit. The appellant's argument of working under a bona fide belief and against double taxation was acknowledged. The Tribunal emphasized that if the principal had already paid the Service Tax, it cannot be demanded again from the appellant, highlighting the importance of Board's Circulars. The remand aimed to ensure a thorough review of the matter and address concerns regarding double taxation and tax already paid by the principal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 06 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347399