<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1388 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194274</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the addition of Rs. 1,64,80,335/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of cash credits and the creditworthiness of shareholders. The deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was reversed since the addition under Section 68 was upheld. The judgment stressed the importance of thorough inquiry and substantiation in share capital and premium transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:58:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1388 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194274</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the addition of Rs. 1,64,80,335/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of cash credits and the creditworthiness of shareholders. The deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was reversed since the addition under Section 68 was upheld. The judgment stressed the importance of thorough inquiry and substantiation in share capital and premium transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>