https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347396 The High Court upheld the decision of the CESTAT, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for verification of documents to determine the admissibility of Cenvat Credit based on specified documents under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Regarding the penalty imposed under Rule 15(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11-AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the High Court directed the adjudicating authority to re-examine the admissibility of Cenvat Credit and decide on the penalty accordingly. Compliance with specified documents for Cenvat Credit was emphasized, and the penalty imposition was linked to the admissibility decision. en-us Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347396 The High Court upheld the decision of the CESTAT, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for verification of documents to determine the admissibility of Cenvat Credit based on specified documents under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Regarding the penalty imposed under Rule 15(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 read with Section 11-AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, the High Court directed the adjudicating authority to re-examine the admissibility of Cenvat Credit and decide on the penalty accordingly. Compliance with specified documents for Cenvat Credit was emphasized, and the penalty imposition was linked to the admissibility decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347396