<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 139 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347382</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a show-cause notice issued under the Customs Act, 1962, citing procedural nature of the notice and the need for addressing factual and legal issues before the adjudicating authority. Emphasizing the absence of fraud allegations against the petitioner and the requirement for evidence presentation, the court declined interference at the initial stage and advised responding to the notice with all contentions. The court stressed the importance of proper adjudication and due process, directing the petitioner to address concerns during the adjudication process, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 139 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347382</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a show-cause notice issued under the Customs Act, 1962, citing procedural nature of the notice and the need for addressing factual and legal issues before the adjudicating authority. Emphasizing the absence of fraud allegations against the petitioner and the requirement for evidence presentation, the court declined interference at the initial stage and advised responding to the notice with all contentions. The court stressed the importance of proper adjudication and due process, directing the petitioner to address concerns during the adjudication process, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>