<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 137 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347380</link>
    <description>The judgment allowed the appeal against the order-in-original due to the violation of natural justice principles. The writ petitioners were permitted to approach the Appellate Authority regarding their export obligations. Despite the breach of natural justice, the payment of duty and interest by the writ petitioner/Firm was confirmed, leading to further proceedings. The case emphasized the significance of adhering to due process and fulfilling obligations under duty concessions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 137 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347380</link>
      <description>The judgment allowed the appeal against the order-in-original due to the violation of natural justice principles. The writ petitioners were permitted to approach the Appellate Authority regarding their export obligations. Despite the breach of natural justice, the payment of duty and interest by the writ petitioner/Firm was confirmed, leading to further proceedings. The case emphasized the significance of adhering to due process and fulfilling obligations under duty concessions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>