<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 134 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347377</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration after the completion of the inquiry by the DRI. The impugned order proposing confiscation of imported goods and penalty imposition was set aside for fresh consideration on merit following the DRI inquiry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:56:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 134 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347377</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration after the completion of the inquiry by the DRI. The impugned order proposing confiscation of imported goods and penalty imposition was set aside for fresh consideration on merit following the DRI inquiry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>