<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 133 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347376</link>
    <description>Input tax credit reversal under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act cannot depart from a binding judicial interpretation of the relevant provision. The proviso to the provision governing credit was confined to the purpose specifically covered by that clause, making the reversal unsustainable. Reversal based on stock and production particulars also required proper examination of records concerning purchases, sales, stock registers, process flow and closing stock; inadequate reasons for rejecting the dealer&#039;s explanation required reconsideration. The assessment was set aside for fresh adjudication after a hearing, applying the binding interpretation and properly considering the factual material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:56:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 133 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347376</link>
      <description>Input tax credit reversal under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act cannot depart from a binding judicial interpretation of the relevant provision. The proviso to the provision governing credit was confined to the purpose specifically covered by that clause, making the reversal unsustainable. Reversal based on stock and production particulars also required proper examination of records concerning purchases, sales, stock registers, process flow and closing stock; inadequate reasons for rejecting the dealer&#039;s explanation required reconsideration. The assessment was set aside for fresh adjudication after a hearing, applying the binding interpretation and properly considering the factual material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>