<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 131 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347374</link>
    <description>Writ interference was declined where the assessee challenged a revisional assessment order mainly on limitation but had not raised that plea in the objections to the revision notice. The Court held that the limitation objection could be pursued under the statutory remedy instead of being examined in writ jurisdiction, and preserved the assessee&#039;s right to have that plea considered on merits. The respondent was directed to afford a personal hearing and pass a speaking order while examining the limitation issue under the applicable statutory remedy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:56:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 131 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347374</link>
      <description>Writ interference was declined where the assessee challenged a revisional assessment order mainly on limitation but had not raised that plea in the objections to the revision notice. The Court held that the limitation objection could be pursued under the statutory remedy instead of being examined in writ jurisdiction, and preserved the assessee&#039;s right to have that plea considered on merits. The respondent was directed to afford a personal hearing and pass a speaking order while examining the limitation issue under the applicable statutory remedy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>