<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 65 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9769</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay considered challenges to notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-01. The court emphasized that the power to reopen assessments cannot be exercised arbitrarily and must be based on reasonable belief of income escaping assessment, not merely a change of opinion. Analyzing specific grounds for reopening, the court found lack of justification for TDS evidence and dividend income issues. The court criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of objections without considering relevant decisions, leading to a ruling that the reopening was based on conjecture, quashing the notices and ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=48791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 65 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9769</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay considered challenges to notices issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act for assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-01. The court emphasized that the power to reopen assessments cannot be exercised arbitrarily and must be based on reasonable belief of income escaping assessment, not merely a change of opinion. Analyzing specific grounds for reopening, the court found lack of justification for TDS evidence and dividend income issues. The court criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s rejection of objections without considering relevant decisions, leading to a ruling that the reopening was based on conjecture, quashing the notices and ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>