<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 116 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleting the additions made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The issue of reopening the assessment was considered academic and not further adjudicated. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, and the addition under section 68 was deemed unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:19:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 116 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and deleting the additions made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The issue of reopening the assessment was considered academic and not further adjudicated. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions, and the addition under section 68 was deemed unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>