<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 100 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment under section 144/147 to be invalid due to the absence of a notice under section 148, failure to provide an opportunity to agents, and the lack of substantive additions. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, quashing the assessment orders for both agents. As the assessment proceedings were annulled, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the case, considering it moot.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:18:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 100 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the reassessment under section 144/147 to be invalid due to the absence of a notice under section 148, failure to provide an opportunity to agents, and the lack of substantive additions. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, quashing the assessment orders for both agents. As the assessment proceedings were annulled, the Tribunal did not address the merits of the case, considering it moot.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>