https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347325 The Tribunal acknowledged errors in the final order and decided to recall it for rectification within the legal framework, emphasizing that rectification should not amount to a review. The appellant's miscellaneous application aimed at correcting errors without seeking a review, while the Revenue opposed a detailed re-examination. The case was scheduled for re-listing to address and rectify the identified errors indicated in the application, focusing on issues related to penalty, non-reference to correspondences, suppression consideration, and plea under Section 66A. en-us Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:17:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347325 The Tribunal acknowledged errors in the final order and decided to recall it for rectification within the legal framework, emphasizing that rectification should not amount to a review. The appellant's miscellaneous application aimed at correcting errors without seeking a review, while the Revenue opposed a detailed re-examination. The case was scheduled for re-listing to address and rectify the identified errors indicated in the application, focusing on issues related to penalty, non-reference to correspondences, suppression consideration, and plea under Section 66A. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 13 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347325