<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 80 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347323</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi overturned the lower authorities&#039; decision on service tax liability issues. It ruled that the commission received by the appellant was exempted until July 2004 and cutting charges did not qualify as Business Auxiliary Services due to being categorized as manufacturing. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the service tax liability imposed on the appellant, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 80 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347323</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi overturned the lower authorities&#039; decision on service tax liability issues. It ruled that the commission received by the appellant was exempted until July 2004 and cutting charges did not qualify as Business Auxiliary Services due to being categorized as manufacturing. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the service tax liability imposed on the appellant, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347323</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>