<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 75 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347318</link>
    <description>Where Cenvat credit wrongly availed is reversed before utilisation, interest is not payable because reversal itself neutralises the credit before any use. On penalty, suppression of facts was not established, particularly where the interest issue had been subject to conflicting judicial views and the assessee was a public sector undertaking. The penalty was therefore not sustainable and was set aside. The assessee obtained full relief from both interest and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:16:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 75 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347318</link>
      <description>Where Cenvat credit wrongly availed is reversed before utilisation, interest is not payable because reversal itself neutralises the credit before any use. On penalty, suppression of facts was not established, particularly where the interest issue had been subject to conflicting judicial views and the assessee was a public sector undertaking. The penalty was therefore not sustainable and was set aside. The assessee obtained full relief from both interest and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>