<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 74 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347317</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of Cenvat credit on construction services and supply of readymix concrete. The appellant was found entitled to the credit for construction services before 31.3.2011, as construction services were not excluded from the definition of input service during that period. The denial of Cenvat credit on the supply of readymix concrete was set aside as it was not part of the Show Cause Notice. The appellant was also granted Cenvat credit for construction services done within their factory premises, except for activities near the Railway station. The appeal was partly allowed based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 74 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347317</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the denial of Cenvat credit on construction services and supply of readymix concrete. The appellant was found entitled to the credit for construction services before 31.3.2011, as construction services were not excluded from the definition of input service during that period. The denial of Cenvat credit on the supply of readymix concrete was set aside as it was not part of the Show Cause Notice. The appellant was also granted Cenvat credit for construction services done within their factory premises, except for activities near the Railway station. The appeal was partly allowed based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347317</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>