https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347302 Where disputed questions of fact arise in a tax challenge, and the statute provides an effective appellate remedy, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked. The controversy over alleged inter-State sale, cancellation of the purchase order, and liability to tax and penalty required factual adjudication, which the appellate authority under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could examine. No exceptional circumstance was shown to bypass that remedy, so interference with the writ court's order was not warranted and the writ appeal was held not maintainable. en-us Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Mar 2018 14:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347302 Where disputed questions of fact arise in a tax challenge, and the statute provides an effective appellate remedy, writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should ordinarily not be invoked. The controversy over alleged inter-State sale, cancellation of the purchase order, and liability to tax and penalty required factual adjudication, which the appellate authority under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 could examine. No exceptional circumstance was shown to bypass that remedy, so interference with the writ court's order was not warranted and the writ appeal was held not maintainable. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 21 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347302