<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1360 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194245</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as it found no evidence of deliberate tax evasion or mala fide intent. The appellant&#039;s full payment of tax and interest before the notice was issued demonstrated lack of suppression of fact with intent to evade tax, leading to the conclusion that the penalty was unwarranted. Additionally, the tribunal noted the minimal discrepancy in the declared amount and the lack of deliberate non-payment, ultimately allowing the appeal on the grounds of unjustified penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1360 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194245</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, as it found no evidence of deliberate tax evasion or mala fide intent. The appellant&#039;s full payment of tax and interest before the notice was issued demonstrated lack of suppression of fact with intent to evade tax, leading to the conclusion that the penalty was unwarranted. Additionally, the tribunal noted the minimal discrepancy in the declared amount and the lack of deliberate non-payment, ultimately allowing the appeal on the grounds of unjustified penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>