<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1445 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194248</link>
    <description>Services connected with an educational institution were held eligible for service tax exemption where they formed an essential part of a course or curriculum leading to a certificate, diploma, degree or other qualification recognised by law. The respondent&#039;s one-time affiliation to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University and the fact that the degree awarded was recognised by the UGC supported satisfaction of the exemption conditions. The appellate authority&#039;s factual finding that the notification requirements were met was accepted, and no infirmity was found in that conclusion. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1445 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194248</link>
      <description>Services connected with an educational institution were held eligible for service tax exemption where they formed an essential part of a course or curriculum leading to a certificate, diploma, degree or other qualification recognised by law. The respondent&#039;s one-time affiliation to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University and the fact that the degree awarded was recognised by the UGC supported satisfaction of the exemption conditions. The appellate authority&#039;s factual finding that the notification requirements were met was accepted, and no infirmity was found in that conclusion. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>