<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1446 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194249</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed regarding the demand of service tax on customized software under ITSS and under BAS for services performed abroad. The demand under IPS and MMR Service was dropped for the relevant periods. The Tribunal ruled that Cenvat credit was not allowable for the services provided. Penalties imposed were set aside due to the introduction of ITSS from 16-5-2008. The appeals were disposed of with modifications, directing re-quantification of demands within specified parameters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1446 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194249</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed regarding the demand of service tax on customized software under ITSS and under BAS for services performed abroad. The demand under IPS and MMR Service was dropped for the relevant periods. The Tribunal ruled that Cenvat credit was not allowable for the services provided. Penalties imposed were set aside due to the introduction of ITSS from 16-5-2008. The appeals were disposed of with modifications, directing re-quantification of demands within specified parameters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>