<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1239 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194242</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with only net receipts after deducting expenses for security and pantry services to be considered as part of rental income. The decision emphasized the primary purpose of property exploitation for rental income and clarified the treatment of specific amenities in the overall income assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1239 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194242</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with only net receipts after deducting expenses for security and pantry services to be considered as part of rental income. The decision emphasized the primary purpose of property exploitation for rental income and clarified the treatment of specific amenities in the overall income assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>