<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1263 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194243</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against a demand under Rule 6(3) for Cenvat credit on common inputs. The appellant had already reversed the credit with interest, albeit below the required rate. The Tribunal set aside the order, directing the appellant to deposit the differential interest and submit a compliance report within 30 days. This decision ensures adherence to the Tribunal&#039;s directives and monitors the case&#039;s resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2017 11:14:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1263 - CESTAT  ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194243</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal against a demand under Rule 6(3) for Cenvat credit on common inputs. The appellant had already reversed the credit with interest, albeit below the required rate. The Tribunal set aside the order, directing the appellant to deposit the differential interest and submit a compliance report within 30 days. This decision ensures adherence to the Tribunal&#039;s directives and monitors the case&#039;s resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>