<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 44 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347287</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on the assessee for non-filing of a return in the assessment year 2002-03. The Court concluded that without a provision deeming concealment of income, the assessee&#039;s case did not fall under the relevant provision. As the unamended Explanation 3 did not apply to the assessee for the assessment year in question, the penalty imposition was deemed incorrect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 44 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347287</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on the assessee for non-filing of a return in the assessment year 2002-03. The Court concluded that without a provision deeming concealment of income, the assessee&#039;s case did not fall under the relevant provision. As the unamended Explanation 3 did not apply to the assessee for the assessment year in question, the penalty imposition was deemed incorrect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>