<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 43 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347286</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act due to non-deduction of TDS, following a Supreme Court decision that the section applies to both amounts payable and actually paid. The Tribunal&#039;s decision restoring the disallowance was affirmed, setting aside the earlier judgment in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 43 - JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347286</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance of expenses under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act due to non-deduction of TDS, following a Supreme Court decision that the section applies to both amounts payable and actually paid. The Tribunal&#039;s decision restoring the disallowance was affirmed, setting aside the earlier judgment in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>