<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (8) TMI 94 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194231</link>
    <description>Co-plaintiffs joined in one suit are expected to act jointly because joinder serves to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and save judicial time; they do not have an independent right to engage separate advocates and conduct the case separately. The court may regulate representation by directing one advocate or one plaintiff to be in charge of the case for all co-plaintiffs, and may thereby prevent duplicated or prolonged examination and cross-examination. Order 1 Rules 11 and 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure are read as preserving the court&#039;s control over the conduct of the suit and permitting joint representation in the interests of efficient case management.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:54:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (8) TMI 94 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194231</link>
      <description>Co-plaintiffs joined in one suit are expected to act jointly because joinder serves to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and save judicial time; they do not have an independent right to engage separate advocates and conduct the case separately. The court may regulate representation by directing one advocate or one plaintiff to be in charge of the case for all co-plaintiffs, and may thereby prevent duplicated or prolonged examination and cross-examination. Order 1 Rules 11 and 12 of the Code of Civil Procedure are read as preserving the court&#039;s control over the conduct of the suit and permitting joint representation in the interests of efficient case management.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>