<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 30 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347273</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the orders by setting aside the demand for service tax on legal fees and directing the authority to reevaluate the demand. The penalties imposed under Section 76 and 78 were also set aside, considering the circumstances of the case and the revenue-neutral aspect. The appeals were partly allowed based on the above terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 07:47:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 30 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347273</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the orders by setting aside the demand for service tax on legal fees and directing the authority to reevaluate the demand. The penalties imposed under Section 76 and 78 were also set aside, considering the circumstances of the case and the revenue-neutral aspect. The appeals were partly allowed based on the above terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>