https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347272 The court held that blending and packaging tea did not amount to manufacturing, overturning the demand for service tax and penalties under Business Auxiliary Services. The court considered legal precedents and distinguished between production, manufacturing, and processing of tea. Relying on case law, the court set aside the orders, allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347272 The court held that blending and packaging tea did not amount to manufacturing, overturning the demand for service tax and penalties under Business Auxiliary Services. The court considered legal precedents and distinguished between production, manufacturing, and processing of tea. Relying on case law, the court set aside the orders, allowing the appeals with consequential reliefs. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347272