https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347267 The court held that the appellant's appeal, filed before the amendment to Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, required the deposit of the entire disputed amount. As the appellant did not comply, the appeal was dismissed, favoring the Revenue. The court determined that the amended provisions did not apply retroactively to appeals filed before the enforcement of the amendment, emphasizing the statutory language. The Tribunal found the Revenue had a strong case and low chances of success for the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. en-us Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Sep 2017 07:47:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347267 The court held that the appellant's appeal, filed before the amendment to Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, required the deposit of the entire disputed amount. As the appellant did not comply, the appeal was dismissed, favoring the Revenue. The court determined that the amended provisions did not apply retroactively to appeals filed before the enforcement of the amendment, emphasizing the statutory language. The Tribunal found the Revenue had a strong case and low chances of success for the appellant, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 29 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=347267